Here’s a clip of Radiohead’s 2003 song “Go to Sleep” taken from their album Hail to the Thief.

One of the key challenges with this band is that they’ve made so many radical changes from album to album, that they’re in constant competition with themselves, more so than with most bands. In the opinions of many, this record didn’t quite hold up to Kid A and Amnesiac. Yet, to be fair, very few albums held up in comparison to those, so the point about stiff competition within their own catalogue and without is proven.

But I think that HttT featured some of the band’s best work, this track included, and I think it can be argued that the group managed to synthesize their strengths into a record that still sounds like Radiohead. And they’ve done so without sacrificing one texture over another to an impressive degree here. Love them or hate them, they’ve been able to pull off this trick better than most. And it’s no easy trick.

On this track, they play pretty close to the sound they established on 1997’s OK Computer. But even on that album, the group added texture by way of electronics to separate them from the sound they created for themselves as a straight-up guitar band, writing songs on their own terms, seemingly in reaction to none. And this track proves that you can do that, and still serve a rock sound without crossing into ‘dance-rock’ territory, which to me would lose the subtlety of the music entirely.

Overall on this track and many others on this same album, Radiohead make the ominous atmospherics and aggressive guitars and drums work together without anyone seeing the seams. It’s easy enough, given the asset of Thom Yorke’s voice, and Jonny Greenwood’s dexterity when it comes to constrasting texture and arrangement. And Phil Selway is a vastly underrated drummer, even in the face of Yorke’s recent tendency to turn to the laptop for beats.

A lot of the criticisms placed against this album were unfair, but a lot weren’t. It’s too long, and the pacing suffers greatly as a result. They corrected this with 2007’s In Rainbows to a larger degree. But, for songs that work on an individual basis such as this one, the record is as undeniable as anything the group has put out.

One thing this band has always believed in is grass roots communications with fans, in place well before the recent “pay what you can” marketing innovation that everyone but the band themselves viewed as revolutionary. As such, it’s worth checking out the official Radiohead website for blog entries, podcasts, and other assorted information.

To hear more music including unreleased materials, check out Radiohead Myspace page


2 thoughts on “Radiohead perform “Go To Sleep” from Hail to the Thief

  1. This track is great, but not my favorite on the album (which is a toss up between “Where I End and You Begin” and “There There”). This is the first Radiohead album I ever bought and aside from a couple of their hits I hadn’t listened to them before that. Therefore, I have a very strong affection for this album – can’t see how it could be too long!

    In Rainbows is always playing on my iPod.

  2. Hey Zaak,

    This is a solid record by Radiohead, who keep quality control pretty high.

    The opinion that the record was too long was leveled at the record by a few friends and a number of critics too. For me, almost every record I hear is too long, even if I really like them.

    For me, I blame the CD format, which has allowed this trend to occur. I am of the opinion that just because you can make a 74 minute record, it doesn’t mean you should. Not everyone can have their attention held for that long, unless they’re listening to the White Album, maybe. But, how many White Albums have been made – not many, I’d say.

    My standard answer when talking about the optimum length of an album is pretty specific I guess: 43 minutes. That for me is the magic number. You can have a bunch of short songs for that, or spread it out to an epic. But, 43 minutes is what you have to work with. Is this scientific? No. The way I judge it is pretty old school; is there a tiny black band of empty space left over on one side of a C-90? Yes? Good. Onto side 2.

    OK, it’s a very old school way of judging it…

    But, I think there is something to be said for not giving everything you’ve got away. Pacing counts, and so does leaving your audience with something that is compact, and making them yearn for your next record.

    Thanks for comments!

What are your thoughts, Good People? Tell it to me straight.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.